Thursday, February 29, 2024

RootsTech 2024 Insider

I managed to register very early for the online RootsTech 2024 conference which means I was given a RootsTech2024 Insider badge. I've collected the English version along with the German and French in honor of my recent work researching my Huguenot descendant 3rd great grandma. I still need the church records from Fahrenwalde digitized Archion. Please, please let it be sometime soon.

Unfortunately, it is also a very important time here and my time this year will be limited because I've two birthday cakes to make -- one for tonight and one larger cake for Saturday.

My biggest RootsTech tip is: MAKE SURE TO VISIT THE VIRTUAL EXPO HALL.

There are so many specials, deals and savings during this conference. Simply register for the virtual version of the conference with your probably already established FamilySearch.org free username and password. Then you can take advantage of the many savings. Like on DNA, subscriptions, software, and many more -- oh, my. There are 120+ vendors this year.

My plans? I'm looking at the discount for some photo software. And maybe a few other things.

Here are some rare sales that I spotted. MyHeritage DNA is having its very rarely held, what genealogists call the "Grandfathered In" autosomal DNA transfer sale. Transfer your autosomal DNA data from another site (AncestryDNA, FamilyTree DNA, or 23andMe) and get all the DNA tools for free without paying the $29 unlock fee. This sale ends March 4, 2024.

Also, Family Tree Maker is having a sale on its to be released next version, Family Tree Maker 2024. There is a sale path for previous owners and new purchasers which pretty much lead to the same sale price, $29.95 which is a great price. For owners of versions 2017 and earlier and even new purchasers, you will get FTM 2019 now and FTM 2024 when it is released.

©2024 All Rights Reserved, goneresearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Special Birthday for my VERY, VERY VIP


February 29, 2024


Happy Leap Birthday, M. You've safely passed "legal" let's keep working towards 25.


©2024 All Rights Reserved, goneresearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Saturday, October 7, 2023

Remembering the Birthdays for 2 of My VIPs


October 7, 2023


Happy Birthday (171st) second great grandmother Sarah Eliza Vincent and (88th) D.


©2023 All Rights Reserved, goneresearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Friday, May 12, 2023

Update: Fixed the Link Again. So Use this Link for My Count Your Genealogy Numbers Form

My Genealogy Numbers Form


I have had some interest in My Genealogy Numbers Form from 2014 but due to Blogger updates many older links do not work anymore. I updated the link in my 2022 post on my own numbers. But since I am getting new requests either readers are not seeing the latest post or that link has also broken.

So here is a new link to My Genealogy Numbers Form from 2014 here.

Updating the links themselves would likely update the older posts I think messing up this blog's history. As I have said before this form can be shared with others but the proper way to share it is to share the URL address to this blog or to the specific blog post containing the form.

Please do not just physically share the Genealogy Number Form file (doc file) via email or your own website or distribute it via printed copies because I have not given anyone that permission. I'm simply saying tell them about it by sharing the URL address or linking to this blog/website. And that way each person can download the file for their own personal use, and I can get an idea of how many people are using the form. If you need an image of your own results, take a screen capture. That is what I did those that appear here.

Good results with your research everyone in the coming year!


©2023 All Rights Reserved, GoneResearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Year 2022 Stalled: How Many Ancestors Do You Know? Count Your Genealogy Numbers

My Genealogy Numbers Form
Last year I revisited my genealogy numbers after a lapse in blogging. Though this past year (2022) did involve genealogy it was nothing like 2021. In fact, I did not add one direct ancestor to my tree. But I did do genealogy here and there when it was possible.

My updated the link to My Genealogy Numbers Form from 2014 here. The form itself is the same but due to Blogger updates many older links do not work anymore. And updating the links themselves would likely update the older posts I think messing up this blog's history. As I have said before this form can be shared with others but the proper way to share it is to share the URL address to this blog or to the specific blog post containing the form. Please do not just physically share the Genealogy Number Form file (doc file) via email or your own website or distribute it via printed copies because I have not given anyone that permission. I'm simply saying tell them about it by sharing the URL address or linking to this blog/website. And that way each person can download the file for their own personal use, and I can get an idea of how many people are using the form. If you need an image of your own results, take a screen capture. That is what I did those that appear here.

Okay back to the form. Now this is not a who has the most "cards" or people in our genealogy program scenario. But rather a look at how many direct ancestors do you know in each generation where you know a first and last name OR at least a first name AND that you have some documentation to go with that linking generation to generation.

This is the sixth year I have counted "My Genealogy Numbers." You can find my 2014 numbers2015 numbers2016 numbers2017 numbers and 2021 numbers at their respective posts.

The reality is that very, very few -- if any of us -- will have all 100% results all the way back through the generations. Natural disasters, people, and a simple lack of recording information have a way of keeping us from the answers we seek. But still we try.

So did I learn anything or find any new direct ancestors since last year? No, but maybe ...

As I said my 2022 genealogy numbers are the same as my 2021 numbers. The maybe comes in what I've done in the last three months of 2022. I took a chance.

Back in 2021 Archion.de website added digitized records for parishes in what was Kreis Prenzlau in Brandenburg province, some of this area now falls under the former Vorpommern province area. I found my family not in the parish I expected (their given last residence) but in an associated parish. I have a copy of a copy of a copy … etc., of a baptismal/birth statement signed by a pastor of two churches. The interesting thing of that well photocopied statement is that the parents' names are conveniently not on it. There are a couple descenders (well the bottom of them) on the top edge of the paper that was photocopied over and over making me think the paper was originally taller and perhaps it was folded in half and this is the bottom portion. So perhaps the surviving portion rather than an intentional sharing not sharing of the full document. We are not sure who ended up with the original or if it was lost to time.

Having access to those parish records, I found most of the family and confirmed 3rd great grandma's surname as Collier. But I couldn't find the baptisms of the first three children nor the marriage record of my 3rd great grandparents. I was able to trace 3rd great grandpa's line back but not his wife's line. Once I squeezed every record I could out of that parish, I spread out and searched nearby parishes for the missing working out further and further from this center point -- the parish with my family's records. 

I kept in mind a birth location mentioned in the eldest child's marriage record just two weeks after she arrived in the United States. Fahrenwalde. Her groom was from Lützlow a village somewhat nearby her siblings' last residence. Duplicate transcripts of the Lützlow church books available through the Family History Library had been checked years ago and she and her family were not in that parish. Though the duplicate church records were a limited time frame they did cover the time frame I needed. So while checking parishes surrounding Wallmow and Schmölln for the missing marriage and baptisms I kept an eye out for other leads. Family lore was this 3rd great grandma was French Huguenot so I also looked at the available French Reformed Churches located in my growing circle of search.

In the Französiche-reformierte Gemeinde Bergholz parish (whose records are in French) I spotted a few Collier families from Fahrenwalde. But I did not spot my 3rd great grandma. This intrigued me so much that months later I decided to research these Colliers. Even though I had no evidence of a tie yet, my gut said they are related some how. So I searched and entered putting them in a tree. Based on holes (missing people) I came to the conclusion the answers are indeed in Fahrenwalde specifically the Evangelische Kirche Fahrenwalde. I suspected one particular family. At first it seemed grandma might be one of the daughters but birth dates did not match. Further research and tracing these kids forward I suspect 3rd great grandma is another daughter or a daughter of one of the older sons. In the process of tracing the siblings of this particular family to other parishes, I actually found another child for my 3rd great grandparents and one of the missing baptisms. Looking at baptismal sponsors for the children of these particular siblings, I found my 3rd great grandparents were occasionally involved as sponsors. Usually family is among these sponsors. Not always but quite often. But unfortunately no more specific clues could be drawn out as to if 3rd great grandma is one of the siblings or a niece.

Having run out of records in my circular search perimeter, I looked at our DNA matches. Though a search of the Collier surname didn't yield much of use, some of the other surnames did turn up in the matches. That particular family is related but I am still not sure how. In studying the likely father/grandfather of 3rd great grandma trying to take his lineage back further, I came to a theory about which guy of the same name and about the right age time frame was his father. And actually my theory expanded, that his father was likely married three times -- twice to two Huguenot descendant girls who died shortly after giving birth and then to a girl of German descent BUT ... the answers likely lie back in Fahrenwalde in the Evangelische Kirche there. Sigh. Even more patience needed. Those church records are not digitized and online yet, so though the earlier research is done I still can not make a connection or two.

While doing this research I also educated myself about the Huguenots -- their history and where/when they emigrated and the records they may have left and where to find them. Back however many years ago, when which ever groups were indexing these Huguenots they only indexed the Französiche-reformierte Gemeinde churches in this area. So if someone of Huguenot descent married a person of German descent and attended Evangelische Kirche they didn't follow those individuals and index those Evangelische churches too just the Französiche-reformierte churches.

With time left on my short-term subscription, I did play around further tracking some of these Huguenot Colliers whose origins were mentioned in the records back to Mannheim and Friesenheim along with a stop in Magdeburg. But I'm not back to France yet. I really need to fill in that black hole of missing information in Fahrenwalde. I had been grumpy that it seemed like all the records being added lately to Archion were from one Archive. I realized just before the turn of the year that it was the Magdeburg area being added and I might need those records in the future.

I'm less grumpy now. But still not so patiently waiting for more Vorpommern and Brandenburg parishes to be digitized and uploaded to the Archion.de website. And for some Mecklenburg parishes too. From where ever they digitized the Mecklenburg church record microfilms on Ancestry, they did not have them all. It seems no matter which research I try to pick up this month, something is always missing digitally. So to see some things I have to visit the nearest FamilySearch Center where I know the microfilms were at though I might be able to see some of them online when inside the FSC. Did you hear that genealogy angels/fairies? I have two vouchers to use this year along with one new one good for two years. I REALLY want some more church records at Archion.

My Genealogy Numbers for 2021 and again for 2022.

Further progress on my genealogy numbers will likely require a research trip to a specific document-rich location, or more original records to be digitized and uploaded to a website out there somewhere on the internet. Hopefully an adventuring archivist out there discovers long-forgotten records squirreled away in his/her archives and realizes their value to today's genealogists and historians and takes the effort to get these "newly found" records digitized and placed online so new discoveries and knowledge can be made by many. Or maybe a genealogy company can make some new agreements with some archives to make long-stored records accessible through digitization such as early census records and residential records researched by a well-known author of genealogy books, particularly those in the former Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Vorpommern and Brandenburg areas. (Just a thought.)

So how did I do this year with my Genealogy Numbers?

Recapping my numbers which are the same as last year, "My Overall Identified Ancestors Total and Overall Percentage" stands at 295 and .90% going back to my fifteenth generation or 12th great grandparents level. Most others have been comparing their numbers at the 10th generation level and in that case my numbers are -- 255 ancestors out of 1023 total for a 24.93% standing.

I made the form I use is in Microsoft Word and it will automatically calculate the percentages with a right-click of the mouse. Now I did not come up with this fun exercise, I simply made a form that will do the math for me and save me time. And decided it would be nice to share.

As in prior years, I still would like the genealogy angels/fairies if they are reading this to help with a few lines so I can fill out the sparse areas of my tree. I know my wants/wishes list is growing but I just want to remind  you of where I am stuck and in want of help. 
  • My newest line I need help with is my Collier line. Please genealogy angels/fairies, please, let the Fahrenwalde parish in former Kreis Prenzlau be digitized an put on the Archion website. I really need that parish to answer those questions. And while you are at it more parishes from the former Vorpommern area and additional parishes from various areas of Mecklenburg.
  • I still would like cousins testing their DNA like descendants of Vincent families of early 1800s Hastings and Prince Edward Counties in Ontario, Canada. Or whichever Vincent/Vinson family is the correct one! Joseph needs some parents and siblings and some ancestors -- he is now my shortest line. A photo of his two daughters hangs on the wall behind me. Come on girls, find me your daddy's lineage!
  • Also nice would be Rider families of mid-1700s and later Dutchess County, New York, and perhaps some better clues showing where John came from prior to his being in Massachusetts and Rhode Island -- he needs some provable parents not the undocumented guesses.
  • DNA matches for Samuel Rider's unnamed wife's family as well as other descendants of Samuel and her would be really, really helpful to figure out who she and her parents were -- perhaps giving us a possible DAR line? -- but at least names so I can connect them and trace them back in time.
  • And for my beloved Dunham family, more answers/records to move the correct line of Deacon John Dunham back further in England. And, maybe for researchers to stop believing and holding on to the false lineage presented so long ago.

Hazzard descendants are still rolling in nicely in regards to DNA so thank you genealogy angels/fairies. I still don't know exactly when Anna died or what her husband's name was but I know a few of their kids now and their descendants. And, thank you genealogy angels/fairies for those German lines that I now know though I still have brick walls and questions galore there so more help there too please.

Good results with your research everyone in the coming year!


©2023 All Rights Reserved, GoneResearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Sunday, January 23, 2022

Year 2021 was a Great Year for Genealogy Here: How Many Ancestors Do You Know? Count Your Genealogy Numbers

My Genealogy Numbers Form
The last count of my genealogy numbers was in 2017. Things have been busy here. And though it seems contrary it has been even busier during these pandemic years keeping family safe. I am hoping to carve out some time to do more genealogy for my family. When I have had the time it has gone to necessary work for the organizations to which I belong. As many are doing I am trying to find a balance to fulfill all my interests and have-tos.

I am updating the link to My Genealogy Numbers Form from 2014 here. The form itself is the same but due to Blogger updates many older links do not work anymore. And updating the links themselves would likely update the older posts I think messing up this blog's history. As I have said before this form can be shared with others but the proper way to share it is to share the URL address to this blog or to the specific blog post containing the form. Please do not just physically share the Genealogy Number Form file (doc file) via email or your own website or distribute it via printed copies because I have not given anyone that permission. I'm simply saying tell them about it by sharing the URL address or linking to this blog/website. And that way each person can download the file for their own personal use, and I can get an idea of how many people are using the form. If you need an image of your own results, take a screen capture. That is what I did those that appear here.

Okay back to the form. Now this is not a who has the most "cards" or people in our genealogy program scenario. But rather a look at how many direct ancestors do you know in each generation where you know a first and last name OR at least a first name AND that you have some documentation to go with that linking generation to generation.

This is the fifth year I have counted "My Genealogy Numbers." You can find my 2014 numbers2015 numbers and 2016 numbers and 2017 numbers at their respective posts.

The reality is that very, very few -- if any of us -- will have all 100% results all the way back through the generations. Natural disasters, people, and a simple lack of recording information have a way of keeping us from the answers we seek. But still we try.

So did I learn anything or find any new direct ancestors since last year? Yes!

While my 2017 genealogy numbers were the same as my 2016 numbers, I did add a few ancestors in 2018 -- four 6th great grandparents, two 7th great grandparents and two 8th great grandparents. For 2019 the numbers stayed the same as 2018. Though I created forms for these in-between years I am not posting them here. It was more for personal reference that I defined what year I discovered what (or who) in my lineage tree.

In 2020 I had to remove a branch of my tree. It was not very big, just two generations, but it was far back and one I was fond of having. I finally found the marriage of a set of 4th great grandparents. It indicated that we had the wrong person identified as 4th great grandpa. Long ago I had checked the work of grandpa's cousins but there wasn't any information to disprove or prove he was the right guy. He had made sense but this newly found marriage clearly indicated the real guy. Luckily I only had to disconnect Dad's side because the parents of the wrong guy were also the parents of one of Mom's lines so I really didn't lose that line like most people would. It just meant Dad and Mom are not 5th cousins anymore. But the connection is likely further back -- same surname, same small area of villages. Hopefully the records hold out because I am getting back to the very early church records. So even though I lost a 4th great grandfather and two 5th great grandparents, I actually gained besides the right 4th great grandfather, four 5th great grandparents (the marriage record also gave the information needed to find her parents too), and two 6th great grandparents.

2021 started off good. In trying to connect one of those 2020 found 5th great grandmothers to the only other person of the same surname in the parish I finally made the connection in another parish. She and he were siblings not father/daughter. It was disappointing to "lose" my first possible von ... ancestor but instead of a new brick wall (where the heck where they married) I found the siblings' parents and more -- adding two 6th great grandparents and two 7th great grandfathers too. And the discovery that the new line was a line of Mühlers (the occupation not the surname) both wind and water millers. Unfortunately of the three mills involved so far, none have survived time but I know where they once stood.

Then in April 2021 I learned some fantastic news. The website for the partnership of the various Evangelische Kirche archives in Germany (called Archion.de) was finally uploading parishes from Kreis Prenzlau in Brandenburg and some parishes from Dad's side were included. This was an area where though the archive in Berlin had microfiche of the church books they were only viewable in Germany. Of course, I still need additional parishes to be digitized to continue my search of this line but I added one 3rd great grandfather, two 4th great grandparents, four 5th great grandparents, and five 6th great grandparents. For third great grandma -- I was right! We had four or five variations on her surname and my educated guess was right -- Collier. Now just be kind and give me access to your marriage record, the earliest kids' baptisms, and your lineage from your parents back. I'll do the work, I just need access.

I also learned in Spring that parishes from my grandmother's area of Vorpommern were being digitized and were expected to be uploaded to the Archion.de website in 2022. In September 2021 I had to start a Archion voucher (gift certificate) before it expired in December. So I worked on a line for a cousin which was collateral to me. As I was finishing tracing generations back on that cousin's line, I learned via email that those Vorpommern parishes (which included grandma's baptismal parish and a couple nearby parishes) were being uploaded in just weeks -- much earlier than originally thought. This too is an area that was not microfilmed and not all the parishes had copies in the regional archive. So access was only by writing postal letters or getting permission to visit the church and view the records (and affording to do so.)

I knew three of the parishes uploaded were ones I needed for grandma. Two I had visited -- too many ancestors and too little time -- and one I had not visited. I ended up following trails to two other of the uploaded parishes and trails to a few other churches further away not digitized yet. (My ancestors are getting closer to the Baltic Sea and Sweden! I don't want patronymic names -- it just does not sound like fun research. Unfortunately, I am getting into the time Sweden and Denmark controlled this area and the likelihood increases someone long, long ago came from Sweden or Denmark.) Of course, there are several churches nearby grandma's baptismal church where she has ancestors too that are not yet digitized either. And I am hoping and praying those parishes will allow their church books to be digitized and uploaded. 

With this first upload of Pommern parish church books, I also realized that one of the parishes uploaded had some of Mom's one line pass through for a time so I utilized those records too. Unfortunately this line was collateral not direct so no new adds there to my direct line. I am waiting for those parishes where Mom's direct line were to be digitized too.

What did I add to 2021's genealogy numbers for grandma? Four 3rd great grandparents (resulting in a completed generation), six 4th great grandparents, twelve 5th great grandparents, sixteen 6th great grandparents, nine 7th great grandparents and one 8th great grandparent. One of my favorite photos of grandma hangs on the wall behind me. So she was with me during this recent genealogy binge into her ancestry.

I am so happy. I can not wait for more Vorpommern and Brandenburg parishes to be digitized and uploaded to the Archion.de website. Did you hear that genealogy angels/fairies? I have two new vouchers and they are good to activate for up to two years.

My Genealogy Numbers for 2021

Though much progress has been made on My Genealogy Numbers, further progress will likely require  a research trip to a specific document-rich location, or more original records to be digitized and uploaded to a website out there somewhere on the internet. Hopefully an adventuring archivist out there discovers long-forgotten records squirreled away in his/her archives and realizes their value to today's genealogists and historians and takes the effort to get these "newly found" records digitized and placed online so new discoveries and knowledge can be made by many. Or maybe a genealogy company can make some new agreements with some archives to make long-stored records accessible through digitization such as early census records and residential records researched by a well-known author of genealogy books, particularly those in the former Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Vorpommern and Brandenburg areas. (Just a thought.)

So how did I do this year with my Genealogy Numbers?

I'd say this was a positive event year to put it mildly. As a recap from last time "My Overall Identified Ancestors Total and Overall Percentage" stands at 295 and .90% going back to my fifteenth generation or 12th great grandparents level. Most others have been comparing their numbers at the 10th generation level and in that case my numbers are -- 255 ancestors out of 1023 total for a 24.93% standing.

I made the form I use is in Microsoft Word and it will automatically calculate the percentages with a right-click of the mouse. Now I did not come up with this fun exercise, I simply made a form that will do the math for me and save me time. And decided it would be nice to share.

As in prior years, I still would like the genealogy angels/fairies if they are reading this to help with a few lines so I can fill out the sparse areas of my tree. 
  • I still would like cousins testing their DNA like descendants of Vincent families of early 1800s Hastings and Prince Edward Counties in Ontario, Canada, Or whichever Vincent/Vinson family is the correct one! Joseph needs some parents and siblings and some ancestors -- he is now my shortest line. A photo of his two daughters hangs on the wall behind me. Come on girls, find me your daddy!
  • Also nice would be Rider families of mid-1700s and later Dutchess County, New York, and perhaps some better clues showing where John came from prior to his being in Massachusetts and Rhode Island -- he needs some provable parents not guesses.
  • DNA matches for Samuel Rider's unnamed wife's family as well as other descendants of Samuel and her would be really, really helpful to figure out who she and her parents were -- perhaps giving me a possible DAR line? -- but at least names so I can trace them back in time.
  • And for my beloved Dunham family, more answers/records to move the correct line of Deacon John Dunham back further in England. And, maybe for researchers to stop believing and holding on to the false lineage presented so long ago.

Hazzard descendants are still rolling in nicely in regards to DNA so thank you genealogy angels/fairies. I still don't know when Anna died or what her husband's name was but I know a few of the kids now and their descendants. And, thank you genealogy angels/fairies for those German lines that I now know though I still have brick walls and questions galore there so more help there too please.

Good results with your research everyone in the coming year!


©2022 All Rights Reserved, goneresearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

My Discovery: A Few Rare Manuscripts and Documents for Beekman Patent are Digitized!

This past Saturday I attended a Zoom Meeting for a genealogical society of a county where my early ancestors had settled for almost a century before my direct line migrated onwards leaving some relations in that area for at least a time. A family member had been a long-distance member of the group for some time but we have never attended an in-person meeting. 

Despite all the negatives of this COVID-19 pandemic, having the opportunity and ability to attend far away meetings virtually has indeed been a positive. I have virtually attended meetings for societies and groups in my own state, in near and far states, and in various parts of Ontario, Canada. Most of these groups did not do virtual meetings or recordings of in-person meetings prior to the pandemic. 

Saturday's virtual meeting was for the Dutchess County Genealogical Society in New York. While it was more of an informal presentation by author Frank J. Doherty, senior, on the rare record sources used in his book series, The Settlers of the Beekman Patent, it was still informative.

It also inspired me to revisit this line of mine that moved to the patent and get a few more details into my genealogy program that had not been entered yet. In addition to sorting through and organizing some files on the hard drives and entering information (and sourcing) into the genealogy program, I also revisited one of the rare sources and made a discovery.

First, here is a simplified look at the situation. In the 17th century, large tracts of land in the Dutch Colony of New Netherland were awarded to some invested members of the Dutch West India Company. These "patroons" were landowners with manorial rights and had to settle at least 50 families (or individuals?) within four years. Patroons often leased tracts/lots of land from a patent rather than sell them outright. Leases could be the term of three lives (perpetual) and often came with feudal obligations (i.e. so many days work for the patroon, so many fowls, first rights to proceeds of farm/work, etc.) The political environment through the years changed -- the English takeover in 1664 and American independence in 1783 -- the system essentially continued with the English government granting large patents of land to "proprietors" who surveyed, subdivided and either leased or sold smaller lots of land. Some patroons or proprietors were not successful while a few continued for generations. In 1839 there was an attempt to collect back rents which resulted in riots. In 1845 there was the "Anti-Rent" convention. In 1846 the legislature abolished distress for rent, quarter sales, and all remnants of feudal obligations, and forbade the leasing of agricultural land for a longer period than 12 years.

Land records are an important part of genealogical research. They connect a person to a location for a time period. Some yield more information (i.e. relationships) than others. Where you find land records depends on the location you are dealing with, the type of land you are dealing with, how it was received and from whom, and the time period to some extent. In most states you will find the land records were recorded and kept on the county level but in some New England states land records are kept on the town level. Besides various types of deeds, you may find mortgages (and their discharges) were recorded. But if your ancestor rented land from a private individual you won't find that in the land records. The initial purchase or distribution of land from the government is recorded by the government (i.e. Federal government) and sometimes (but not always) that grant is copied into the locally kept land records. If the land was purchased from a land company (a private company) that sale is recorded in the company records but not always found in the local records.

Depending on when and where your ancestor settled you may learn you are dealing with a patroon/proprietor lease of patent land situation which falls at the "private/family" entity side of the scale. Each patent is different: some have surviving records but not all. And because some patroon families intermarried records from different patents are sometimes held together. When records do survive today a patent's records could be located in a variety of places. More than likely the records are in archives, libraries or even museums rather than government offices.

Many of the records for Beekman Patent survive and were donated by descendants to Princeton University in 1986. But some of those donated records which include records for other patents are with other organizations.

My discovery? It is not new information on my family nor that these records still exist. I've known this since Doherty's book was first published. But ... what I discovered late Saturday night or early Sunday morning depending on your view of the clock is that a few of these records from this collection located at Princeton have been digitized. Digitized and in color and available from the comfort of home for free!

Oh, how I love an original record image rather than a transcription, index or abstract.

But before you get too excited, realize that it is just a few items of the collection digitized not the complete collection. I lucked out that a couple items that I had on a Research Trip bucket list can now be checked off but not everything.

The Beekman Patent records are part of the Edward Livingston Papers (C0280) which are part of The Delafield Family Papers at The Firestone Library. Each collection of papers (Livingston and Delafield) has its own finding aid to cut down on confusion. The collection actually consists of papers from multiple family members spanning generations in some cases. Henry Beekman (1688-1776,) who inherited Beekman Patent and Rhinebeck from his father, was a grandfather of Edward Livingston (1764-1836) for whom the papers take their name.

So, in the series of the collection for Henry Beekman under the Financial Records three items listed for container Box 129 have been digitized. These include a Daybook, Rent Book and Account Book.

The Day Book is noted as circa 1741-1763. Written in script on the volume's cover is "Cladd Book" which appears to be a combination of Welsh and English with Cladd translating to burial thus Burial book. However, the book is arranged by date thus the likely description given as a Day Book. But it contains far more than a diary of notations of the dates individuals died. It is also a daily notation of events and transactions of day to day dealings with regards to the business of the leases. The title page of this volume appears to say "Waäst Booke" with what appears to be an overring on top of the second o in "Booke" which isn't a norm since my fonts will not create the combination.  While the second word is more clearly identifiable as Book, the first is questionable at least for me. Is it supposed to be west or waste or something else? Other items written on the title page are in English and some French. There is no index or table of contents in this book.


The Rent Book is noted as 1740 - 1768. Though there is something written on the volume's cover the only word clearly recognizable in the image is Book. On the title page is "Rent Book A" and "A This book for received rents is belonging to Mr Henry Beekman." There is actually a table of contents at the front of this book. However, it is missing the pages for surnames starting with A through K unfortunately.

The Account Book is noted as 1719-1730. Written on the volume's cover is "Ledger B for HB 1719 to 1730." On the title page is "January 1719 Book B Belonging to Henry Beekman." There is no index or table of contents in the book.

For my ancestor, Doherty's footnote was "ELP Box 129, p. 54." The text that used this footnote stated, "... Henry Beekman made a notation in his rent ledger 8 Aug 1846 ..." That particular notation text actually came from the Day Book's page 54 rather than the Rent Book. In Rent Book A there is a notation for my ancestor on page 135 but it is just a brief two line entry referring one to the Cladd Book or Day Book page 54.

Unfortunately, I also need multiple pages from "ELP Book "E"" and from items in Box 157 as well as a Vertical File but I will have to wait for those items to be digitized so they remain on a to-do list for now. Well, at least I hope they will be digitized.

The image viewer used by the library's website is fairly easy to use. It would be nicer if the viewable area of the image was larger and by that I mean that it would utilized more of the available screen real estate. But the viewer does allow page images to be downloaded in various sizes and file types. The choices are: Whole Image 1000 x 1457 pixels jpg; Current View 2000 x 967pixel jpg; Whole Image 1372 x 2000 pixels jpg; Original File tiff; or a PDF file. Information on the page image can be found to the right of the image or below the image viewer. I choose to download the tiff images for the pages I desired. I can use my image editing software to adjust and convert the file type. Oh, and by the way there is no electronic index to these digitized documents. It is strictly manual searching.

The items pertaining to landholdings are referenced in the collection outline by both the person's papers and as an all together series under landholdings regardless of which family member was the creator. So, additional items can be found under landholdings series at the end of the outline. A couple of these items are also digitized too. Under Dutchess County, Surveys noted as Container Box B-0000060, Folder 15-17 an agreement from 1819 was digitized. Under Dutchess County, Surveys noted as Container Box 157, Folder 8 three small survey maps were digitized. Under Janet Montgomery a Hardenburgh Patent Survey Map was digitized from Container Box 153, Folder 7.

How do you figure out what is digitized and what is not? Click on the search entry box at the top under the collection name but do not enter anything and then click the Search This Collection button. Then in the left column check Available Online to be shown what parts of the collection have something digitized.

We can only hope more of the land record manuscripts and documents are digitized in the future.

©2020 All Rights Reserved, goneresearching. All text and photos in this post are copyrighted & owned by me (goneresearching) unless indicated otherwise. No republication (commercial or non-commercial) without prior permission. You may share (tell others) of this blog as long as you give credit and link to this site (not by downloading or copying any post). Thank you.